SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1413

GURBIR SINGH
Anupam Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of UT, Chandigarh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties :Mr. R.S. Cheema Senior, Advocate, Ms. Tanu Bedi, Mr. Jaiteshwar S. Bhandari AAG, Punjab, Mr. Charanjit Singh Bakhshi Addl. Public Prosecutor

Judgment

Mr. Gurbir Singh, J.

Vide this common order, 17 petitions i.e. CRM-M-680-2023, CRMM-715-2023, CRM-M-771-2023, CRM-M-2787-2023, CRM-M-2820-2023, CRM-M-2849-2023, CRM-M-2851-2023, CRM-M-2853-2023, CRM-M-2857-2023, CRM-M-2861-2023, CRM-M-2871-2023, CRM-M-2873-2023, CRM-M-2877-2023, CRM-M-2900-2023, CRM-M-2911-2023, CRM-M-2913-2023 and CRM-M-2967-2023 shall be disposed of as all these petitions have been filed by Anupam Gupta and are based on similar facts and circumstances.

2. The brief particulars of all the afore-mentioned 17 cases are as under :-

A CRM-M-680-2023 :

FIR No.0099 dated 11.06.2022 under sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC Police Station South Sector-34,Chandigarh.

Name of the complainant -

Narinder Kumar and Ravi Kumar.

Amount involved as per version of the State

30,64,000/-.

Details of project-

Aerosiee + Time Square

Whether project is licensed or approved from RERA

No

B CRM-M- 715 -2023 :

FIR No.0065 dated 21.04.2022 under sections 420 & 120-B IPC Police Station South Sector-34, Chandigarh.

Name of the complainant

Ramesh Kum

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top