Back
HARKESH MANUJA
Gurdaspur Improvement Trust, Gurdaspur – Appellant
Versus
Hardial Singh (Deceased) Through LRs – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. compensation for acquired land and auction details. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. execution proceedings and auction legality. (Para 4 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. arguments regarding auction validity. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. mandatory rules for auction payment. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. revision petition outcome and directions. (Para 11 , 12) |
Judgment
Mr. Harkesh Manuja, J.
By way of present revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, prayer has been made for setting aside the orders dated 03.03.2022 and 04.03.2022 passed by the Executing Court, whereby two separate applications filed at the instance of petitioner/judgment debtor praying for setting aside of the orders dated 20.12.2017 and 15.02.2018 vide which auction was held, besides allowing them to pay the entire balance decretal amount stand rejected.
2. In the present case, the land owned by the private respondents, situated in village Shehzada Nangal, Tehsil and District Gurdaspur was acquired way back in the year 2005, wherein Award was passed by the Collector @ Rs. 12 Lakhs per acre which came to be enhanced to Rs. 24 Lakh per acre in reference by the Land Acquisition Tribunal vide order dated 22.02.2012.
3. During execution proce
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
