Back
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Tekchand Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing of dd due to mala fide registration. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. limitation under section 468 cr.p.c. applicable. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis of limitation periods. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. registration of dd beyond jurisdiction. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 5. petition allowed; dd quashed. (Para 12 , 13) |
Judgment
Mr. Harsimran Singh Sethi J.
The present petition has been filed for quashing of the Kalandra DD No.15, dated 25.01.2020 under Section 182 IPC (Annexure P-1), and other proceedings arising therefrom on the ground that the registration of the said Kalandra is not only mala fide but the same could not have been registered keeping in view the limitation provided under Section 468 of the Cr.P.C.
2. The petitioner, who appears in person, argues that two FIRs were registered by him, being FIR No.130, dated 07.08.2014 as well as FIR No.190/2016 of 01.08.2016, at Police Station Hasanpur, District Palwal, raising certain allegations against the accused therein.
3. The petitioner submits that the investigating agency after conducting investigation in an arbitrary manner, submitted cancellation report dated 28.09.2018 with regard to FIR No.130 dated 07.08.2014 and with regard to the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
