IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.
Sumit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRM-M No. 42141 of 2023
Decided On : 01-09-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the fir and related evidence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments for and against the bail application. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's assessment of trial progress and custody issue. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. granting of bail to the petitioner. (Para 11) |
| 5. conditions imposed upon bail and order disposal. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
Judgment
Mr. Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.
The prayer in the present petition under Section 4 39 Cr.P.C is for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.0004 dated 15.07.2022 under Sections 3 84, 153, 153-A, 120-B, 212, 216 IPC and Section 25 of the ARMS ACT , 1959 and Sections 3 , 4, 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (added later on), registered at Police Station State Special Operation Cell, SAS Nagar, District Intelligence Wing (CID), Punjab.
2. The brief facts of the case are that SI Harminder Singh, SSOC, Mohali had received secret information that Arshdeep Singh alias Arsh Dala and Gurjant Singh alias Janta against whom a number of cases were pending, had gone abroad on fictitious passports and were indulging in illegal activities in connivance with the agents of the ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence of Pakistan). They had supplied a heavy quantity of arms and ammunition to their accomplices in India and were targeting the people for ransom with an intention to create communal tensions in Punjab, they alongwith the agents of the ISI were likely to target the leaders of religious associations and political parties thereby disturbing peace in the society. Accordingly, the instant FIR came to be registered.
3. During the course of investigation, secret information was received on 28.07.2022 by the investigating agency that Shahrukh Khan (since granted bail vide order dated 11.08.2023 passed in Crm-M-52819-2022) and one Sumit Kumar (petitioner) were constantly in touch with the abovementioned accused. The petitioner and Shahrukh Khan had been promised a payment of Rs.8 lacs by Arsh Dalla and Gurjant Singh. On that date i.e. 28.07.2022, the petitioner and Shahrukh Khan were roaming at the Airport road on a motorcycle bearing No.HR-79C-9707 and had come to collect ransom from some persons at the asking of Arsh Dalla. Accordingly, the petitioner and Shahrukh Khan were nominated as accused in the present case and were arrested on 28.07.2022.
4. During search of Shahrukh Khan, one .315 bore loaded with one live cartridge alongwith two other live cartridges came to be recovered from him. Similarly, from the petitioner one pistol .32 bore pistol having four live cartridges in it were recovered. During the investigation, the petitioner and his co-accused revealed that they had been in contact with Arsh Dalla and were to kill a person in Mohali for a sum of Rs.8. Thereafter, certain other persons were also to be targeted but they had been apprehended by the police.
5. During the course of further investigation, Jagatbir Singh @ Jagta, Dalvir Singh Dhira, Ravinder Singh @ Giana, Deepak Sharma, Sandeep, Vipan Jakhar and Sunny Dagar were nominated as accused in the instant case.
6. From accused-Deepak Sharma, one 9mm pistol alongwith 25 live cartridges and grenades were recovered and from Sandeep Singh grenades alongwith IED were recovered. Thereafter, the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. was submitted against the accused.
7. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that there is no offence whatsoever that has been committed other than under the ARMS ACT . The FIR is based on suspicion. There is no complaint, complainant or witness to the purported assassination attempt or extortion. As the petitioner was in custody since 28.07.2022, none of the prosecution witnesses had been examined so far and some of the co-accused had been released on bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., the petitioner was entitled to the same concession. Even otherwise, co-accused/Shahrukh Khan had been granted bail by this Court vide order, Annexure P-3.
8. The learned counsel for the State, on the other hand
The court considered the period of custody, examination of prosecution witnesses, and likelihood of trial conclusion as key factors in granting bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.