IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Harpreet Singh Brar, J.
Jagtar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U.T., Chandigarh – Respondent
CRA-S No. 2586-SB of 2014
Decided On : 01-09-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. observations related to section 50 of the ndps act. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. critique of investigative process and evidence handling. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. conclusion and acquittal of the appellant. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
Judgment
Mr. Harpreet Singh Brar, J.
The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.04.2014 passed by the learned Judge, Special Court, Chandigarh in case bearing FIR No.214 dated 17.08.2012 registered under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act) registered at Police Station Industrial Area, Chandigarh whereby the appellant has been convicted for commission of offence under Section 15 of the NDPS Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years with a fine of Rs.1 lakh and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
2. In brief, the version put forth by prosecution is that on 17.08.2012, SI Malook Singh along with other police officials was present at the checkpoint near CTU workshop depot for checking suspicious persons owing to incidents of theft that had occurred in the city recently. At about 4:30 PM, one vehicle bearing registration No.HP-12-B-4448, which was being driven by the accused-appellant, came from the side of cremation ground of village Dadua and the said vehicle was signalled to be stopped by S.I. Malook Singh. On checking the said vehicle, one plastic gunny bag was found lying near driver’s seat and another plastic gunny bag was recovered from the small box built behind the seat of the driver. Both gunny bags were found to be containing poppy husk. On the asking of the Investigating Officer, the driver of the vehicle disclosed his name as Jagtar Singh son of Banta Singh, resident of Village Allapur, P.S. Kurali, District Mohali. He could not produce any licence or permit for keeping the poppy husk in his possession. The plastic gunny bags were weighed with the help of a weighing machine and the weight came to be 50 kgs for each bag. Two samples of 2 kgs each were taken from each of the plastic gunny bags and thereafter, they were converted into sealed parcels by SI Malook Singh with his seal bearing impression ‘MS’. The seal after use was handed over to SI Balwinder Singh. The sample parcels and the remaining property as well as the vehicle bearing registration No.HP-12-B-4448 were taken into possession vide recovery memo, which was attested by SI Balwinder Singh and Constable Balbir Singh. As the accused appeared to have committed an offence under Section 15 of the NDPS Act by possessing 100 kgs of poppy husk, ruqa was sent to the police station on the basis of which FIR was registered.
3. Thereafter, ASI Amarjit Singh, second Investigating Officer reached the spot and the accused along with entire case property was handed over to him. He prepared a rough site plan. On return to the police station, the accused as well as the entire case property was produced before SHO Malkiat Singh, who affixed his own seal bearing impression ‘MS’ on each of the parcel and deposited the same with MMHC.
4. After completion of investigation, challan against the accused was prepared and presented in the court. As per Section 207 Cr.P.C., copies of documents as relied upon by the prosecution were supplied to the accused free of costs.
5. After considering the rival contentions and perusing the record, commission of offence under Section 15 of the NDPS Act was made out against the accused and thus, he was charged accordingly. The accused-appellant pleaded not guilty to the same and claimed trial.
6. In support of its case, the prosecution examined as many as nine witnesses and thereafter closed its evidence.
7. Statement of the accused-a
Gorakh Nath Prasad vs. State of Bihar
Krishan Chand vs. State of H.P. AIR 2017 SC 3751
Malkiat Singh alias Kala Vs. State of Punjab 2009 1 RCR(Cri) 353
S.K. Raju alias Abdul Haque alias Jagga Vs. State of W.B. (2018) 9 SCC 708
State of Kerala & Ors. v. Kurian Abraham (P) Ltd. & Anr. (2008) 3 SCC 582
State of Rajasthan Vs. Gurmail Singh 2005 2 RCR(Cri) 58
State of Rajasthan Vs. Parmanand and another (2014) 5 SCC 345
Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan
Union of India Vs. Bal Mukund and others 2009 2 RCR(Cri) 574
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of compliance with statutory instructions and the need for substantial compliance with NDPS Act provisions, emphasizing the impact....
Strict compliance with the statutory provisions of the NDPS Act, particularly in cases involving the seizure and disposal of contraband, is crucial to establish the integrity of the evidence and the ....
The conviction was quashed due to failure to comply with mandatory procedures for evidence collection under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the importance of a fair trial.
The mandatory requirements under Section 50 of the NDPS Act must be strictly followed to ensure an individual's rights during searches; failure to comply renders any recovery and subsequent convictio....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.