AMARJOT BHATTI
Veena Rani – Appellant
Versus
Dharampal – Respondent
Judgment
Ms. Amarjot Bhatti, J. (Oral):- The petitioner has filed civil revision against the impugned order dated 16.08.2023 (Annexure P-6) passed by the learned Rent Controller, Ludhiana where in the rent petition titled as “Dharam Pal Vs. Veena Rani” the application to frame additional issue on behalf of the respondents has been wrongly rejected.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record copy of amended petition (Annexure P-1). It is argued that the said ejectment petition has been filed on the ground of arrears of rent, personal necessity premises unfit for human habitation. The issues were framed on 28.03.2017. The copy of said order is Annexure P-2. The respondent Nos.1 and 2 have examined Ravi Kumar, Building Expert who had inspected the premises. The statement of Ravi Kumar, Building Expert as PW1 and the inspection report are Annexures P-3 and P-4 respectively. Thereafter, the present petitioner filed application for framing of additional issue as to whether tenancy premises in question is not fit for human habitation. The copy of said application is Annexure P-5. Without appreciating the facts of the case and the documents on record, the said application h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.