SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1558

AMARJOT BHATTI
Veena Rani – Appellant
Versus
Dharampal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Ishmeet Singh, Mr. Jaideep Verma

Judgment

Ms. Amarjot Bhatti, J. (Oral):- The petitioner has filed civil revision against the impugned order dated 16.08.2023 (Annexure P-6) passed by the learned Rent Controller, Ludhiana where in the rent petition titled as “Dharam Pal Vs. Veena Rani” the application to frame additional issue on behalf of the respondents has been wrongly rejected.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record copy of amended petition (Annexure P-1). It is argued that the said ejectment petition has been filed on the ground of arrears of rent, personal necessity premises unfit for human habitation. The issues were framed on 28.03.2017. The copy of said order is Annexure P-2. The respondent Nos.1 and 2 have examined Ravi Kumar, Building Expert who had inspected the premises. The statement of Ravi Kumar, Building Expert as PW1 and the inspection report are Annexures P-3 and P-4 respectively. Thereafter, the present petitioner filed application for framing of additional issue as to whether tenancy premises in question is not fit for human habitation. The copy of said application is Annexure P-5. Without appreciating the facts of the case and the documents on record, the said application h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top