SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1586

KULDEEP TIWARI
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Ashit Malik, Mr. Chetan Sharma DAG, Haryana

Judgment

Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, J.:- In the instant petition, as cast under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioner has sought the concession of his being enlarged on regular bail, in case FIR No. 35 dated 06.02.2022 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC, registered at Police Station City Safidon, District Jind.

2. The prosecution agency was set into motion on a complaint made by the Union Bank of India, Safidon, District Jind, on 06.02.2022, against one Surender and one Bhupender, both sons of Karan Singh, resident of Village Muwana, Tehsil Safidon, District Jind, for taking KCC limit from the complainant-bank by committing forgery. It was alleged in the complaint that the accused (supra) in a calculated manner, by creating forged documents of the revenue record, obtained loan of Rs.17,00,000/- under Kisan Credit Card Scheme. However, they had already obtained loan from different banks on the land in question, which was mortgaged to the complainant-bank.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, to seek the relief (supra), has submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are that he was the Bank Manager of the Bank concerned at the relevant time and had disb

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top