Jai Singh vs State of Haryana - 2024 Supreme(P&H) 705

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(P&H) 705

KULDEEP TIWARI
Jai Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Pankaj Kaushik, Advocate; For the Petitioner (in CRM-M-46328-2023, CRM-M-48946-2023 & CRM-M-43222-2023).
Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate; For the Petitioner (in CRM-M-48954-2023).
Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate; For the Petitioner (in CRM-M-57135-2023 & CRM-M-61495-2023).
For the Respondent: Mr. Bhupender Singh, D.A.G., Haryana.
Mr. Rahul Jaswal, Advocate for the complainan

JUDGMENT

Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, J.

The amenability of all these petitions, for being decided through a common verdict, emanates from them being arising out of the same FIR, besides emanates from common relief(s) being craved to be reaped therein.

2. Through the instant petitions, the petitioners crave for indulgence of this Court for them being enlarged on regular bail, in case FIR No.195 dated 10.07.2020, under Section 302, 148, 149, 323, 427, 452 of the IPC, registered at P.S. Israna, District Panipat.

Allegations Against The Petitioners

3. Succinctly stated, the allegations against the petitioners are that they, while being armed with deadly weapons, entered into the house of complainant and inflicted injuries to him and his family members. The outcome of this assault, was that, the son of the complainant, namely Ankush, succumbed to his injuries, while three of complainant's family members suffered injuries.

Submissions Of Learned Counsels For The Petitioners

4. The prime argument of the learned counsels appearing for the petitioners is rested upon parity, as petitioners' co-accused, namely, Rajpal, Sandeep, Ram Karan and Anil, have already been granted the concession of regular bail