Sandeep Kumar @ Sanju vs State Of Punjab

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1878

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
KULDEEP TIWARI
Sandeep Kumar @ Sanju – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Kushagra Mahajan, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Akshay Kumar, AAG, Punjab

JUDGMENT :

Kuldeep Tiwari, J.

Through the instant petition, the petitioner craves for indulgence of this Court for his being enlarged on regular bail, in case FIR No.83, dated 05.09.2023, under Sections 379-B(2) read with Section 34 of the IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, (Section 411 and 201 IPC added later on), registered at Police Station Division-C, District Amritsar.

ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE PETITIONER

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith co- accused, had threatened the complainant with a pistol and snatched his money bag containing Rs.l lakh in cash, while he was going to his home after closing his shop on a motorcycle.

SUBMISSIONS OF LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER

3. In asking for the relief (supra), learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a false case which has been implanted upon him and he is injudicial custody since 15.11.2023.

4. He further submits that though the petitioner is involved in another criminal case of similar nature, but in that case, he is already on bail.

5. He further submits that the present petitioner was arrested after one month of the alleged occurrence, and the other co-accused-Sahil @ Gardela, Jaspreet Singh a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document