SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1702

SURESHWAR THAKUR, SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Surjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Joint Development Commissioner (IRD) Punjab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. H.S. Dhandi

Judgment

Mr. Sureshwar Thakur, J.

Notice of motion.

2. Mr. Maninder Singh, DAG, Punjab, waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1. Mr. Sahil Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Paruneet Singh, Advocate waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.2.

3. Gram Panchayat Salempur, Tehsil and District Ludhiana, instituted, on 03.11.2016, a petition under Section 11 of The Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), whereby it claimed the making of a declaratory decree, thus declaring the plaintiff (supra), to be owner in possession of the suit lands.

4. The said petition was based upon the purported illegality occurring in an order passed, on 27.03.1995 by the Consolidation Officer, Hoshiarpur, whereby through a mutation becoming recorded in favour of the proprietors, thus an untenable conferment of right, title and interest over the disputed lands became endowed, upon the plaintiff.

5. On the said raised plea issues were struck by the learned Collector concerned.

6. After adduction of evidence on the said issues but solitarily by the Gram Panchayat concerned, it was concluded, that since in the pre consolidation records, the respondents t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top