SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1638

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sureshwar Thakur, Sudeepti Sharma, JJ.
Gram Panchayat Behbalpur Tehsil Nabha – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CWP No. 19670 of 2021
Decided On : 07-12-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Raj Kumar Garg, Mr. Jaskaran Singh, Mr. Maninder Singh DAG, Punjab, Mr. D.K. Saldi

The court upheld the validity of a mandatory deposit condition for auction money under the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, affirming its compliance with relevant statutory provisions.

Headnote:(A) The Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964 - Rule 6 - Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 26 and 86 - Challenge to mandatory deposit condition for auction money - The court examined the legality of the condition mandating a 30% deposit to the Panchayat Samiti, finding it valid under the provisions of the Act of 1994 and Rules of 1964. (Paras 2, 10, 15)

(B) Legal validity of conditions - The court held that the condition did not violate statutory provisions and was necessary for the proper administration of Panchayat finances. (Paras 10, 15)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenged a condition requiring a 30% deposit of auction money to the Panchayat Samiti, arguing it violated the Rules of 1964 and prejudiced village rights.

Findings of Court:
The court found the condition valid under the Act of 1994, dismissing the petitions.

Issues: The main issues were whether the deposit condition contravened the Rules of 1964 and the rights of the village proprietary body.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the condition was in line with the statutory framework and necessary for the proper functioning of the Panchayat.

Result: Petitions dismissed.

Judgment

Mr. Sureshwar Thakur, J.

Since both the writ petitions make a challenge to condition No.3, as respectively carried in Annexure P-5 in CWP-19670-2021, and, in Annexure P-3 in CWP-13503-2021, therefore both the writ petitions are amenable to be decided through a common verdict.

2. Before proceeding to make an adjudication, upon, the said challenge, it is deemed imperative to extract the impugned condition No.3, as is respectively carried in Annexure P-5 in CWP-19670-2021 and in Annexure P-3 in CWP-13503-2021.

“3. It will be mandatory to deposit 30% Panchayhat Samiti here in the account of concerned Panchayat Samiti through cheque within 15 days of the receipt of auction money. Disciplinary action will be taken against the defaulter Panchayat Secretary, V.D.O. and B.D.P.O. for not doing so.”

Submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner(s)

3. Learned counsels appearing for the respective petitioners, in making a challenge to the validity of incorporation of the said condition, respectively in Annexure P-5 in CWP-19670-2021 and in Annexure P-3 in CWP-13503-2021, thus make a submission before this Court, that the said therein en-grafted condition, is contrary to the provisions, as become en-grafted in Rule 6 of The Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules of 1964”), provisions whereof became extracted hereinafter.

“6. Leases to be by auction:

(1) Subject to the provisions of sub-rule (1) of rule 4 all leases of land in shamlat deh shall be by auction, after making publicity in the manner laid down in sub-rule (10). All documents executed in this connection shall be signed by a Sarpanch or in his absence by Panch performing the duties of the Sarpanch and two other Panches authorized for the purposes by the Gram Panchayat.

(a) one-third of the cultivable land proposed to be leased shall be reserved for giving on lease by auction to the members of the Scheduled Castes only and. If on two different dates fixed for auction no such person is forthcoming, or the Panchayat Samiti refused to confirm the auction, under clause 2(a) (i) the reservation shall cease to have effect; and

(b) any Sarpanch or Panch or member of his or her family, such as: a father, father-in-law, mother, mother-in-law, wife, husband, son grandson, or any other relative dependent on him or her, shall not be allowed to bid for the auction and to take land in Shamlat deh on lease;

(2) Lease of land in Shamlat Deh already under plough shall not be given for a period exceeding three years, while that of land not tinder plough and infested with trees bushes, etc. may be given for a period not exceeding seven years to the highest bidder. The auction shall be subject to the approval of -

(a) the Panchayat Samiti (1) where the area does not exceed one hundred acres and the highest bid of the lease at the auction is less than the average [rate of the similar Shamlat lands in the preceding year].

(ii) where the area exceeds 100 at but does not exceed 500.

(b) the Zila Parishad - Where the area exceeds 500 acres, but does not exceed 1,000 acres:

(c) the Government:- where the area exceed 1000 acres.”

4. They continue to submit, that since the income derived by the Panchayat concerned, is through auction monies becoming deposited before the Panchayat concerned. Therefore, they contend that the said deposit of auction monies, as, made from auctions of Shamlat Deh lands, thereby makes the entire village proprietary body concerned, to hold a lawful right, to claim that it is but utilized for the welfare of the entire village proprietary body concerned. In sequel, they submit, that the interests or rights of the village proprietary body concerned, in the shamlat deh land, which were or are subjected to auction, and, also fetch auction monies, rather would be gravely prejudiced, in case the fetched auction monies, contrarily are utilized for liquidations of salaries and renumerations of the officials of the government officials conc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top