SURESHWAR THAKUR, SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Balwan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
Judgment
Mr. Sureshwar Thakur, J.
CM-13051-CWP-2023
1. The application is allowed subject to all just exceptions and the reply filed on behalf of respondents No. 6 to 8, is taken on record.
Main case.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the litigants, do not dispute the fact, that the demarcation report, if any, which became prepared, thus to unveil whether the present petitioner, who owns lands contiguous to the lands of the Gram Panchayat concerned, thus reveals that he had made encroachment(s), thereons. The revenue officer concerned, has reported that the petitioner had made encroachment(s) upon open spaces within the abadi land, which however vest in the Gram Panchayat.
3. The learned counsels appearing for the contesting litigants, are yet also ad idem that the demarcation report, did not either become tendered into evidence by its author nor the author of the said demarcation report became cross examined by the aggrieved therefrom.
4. The counsels are further ad idem, that unless the demarcation report was proven by its author, thus through his stepping into the witness box and thereafter his becoming cross examined by the aggrieved, thereby alone the authorities below could concl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.