Back
ANOOP CHITKARA
Hartej Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Judgment
Mr. Anoop Chitkara, J. :-
| Complaint Case No. COMA/3/2023 | 16.06.2023 | 3 and 4 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 |
PREDICATE OFFENCE:
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 13 | 02.11.2020 | Vigilance Bureau, FS-1, District SAS Nagar Mohali | 409, 420, 465, 466, 467, 471, 120-B IPC and 7, 7-A of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 |
1. The petitioner, who has been in custody since 08.09.2023, in the FIR captioned above, registered by the Enforcement Directorate, has come up before this Court under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC] seeking bail.
2. Petitioner’s counsel prays for bail by imposing any stringent conditions, including the declaration of assets by the petitioner and family members, and is also voluntarily agreeable to the condition that till the conclusion of the trial, the petitioner shall keep only one mobile number, which is mentioned in AADHAR card, if any, and within fifteen days undertakes to disconnect all other mobile numbers. The petitioner contends that further pre-trial incarceration would cause an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
