SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1596

HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Lakhwinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Gurpal Singh Sandhu, Mr. I.P.S. Sabhawal DAG, Punjab

Judgment

Mr. Harpreet Singh Brar, J.

This revision has been preferred against the judgment dated 09.02.2023 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Fazilka vide which judgment of conviction and order of quantum of sentence dated 09.11.2022 passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Abohar, Fazilka in Criminal Complaint CIS no. NACT/832/2017 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter ‘NI Act’) was upheld. The petitioner was sentenced as under:-

Offence

Sentence

Section 138 of the NI Act

Simple imprisonment of 1 year

The petitioner was also ordered to pay compensation to the tune of the cheque amount i.e. Rs. 48,500/- as envisaged in Section 357(3) of the Cr.P.C, in default of payment of which, the petitioner was ordered to undergo further simple imprisonment of three months.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

2. Briefly, the facts are that to discharge his liability, the petitioner issued a cheque no. 170474 dated 07.05.2019 for Rs. 48,500/- which was dishonoured on presentation for encashment vide memo dated 09.05.2019 with the remarks- ‘funds insufficient.’ Thereafter a legal notice dated 17.05.2019 was served upon the petitioner. However, the petitioner failed t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top