Back
ANOOP CHITKARA
Vipin Pubby – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
Judgment
Mr. Anoop Chitkara, J. :-
| Case no. | Dated | Sections | Court |
| Complaint No.556 of 2008 | 09.08.2008 | 499, 500,501 IPC | Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurgaon (now Gurugram) |
| Criminal Revision No. | Date of Decision | Court |
| 09 of 2016 CIS No. CRR/351/2016 CNR No.HRGR01-008822-2016 | 04-06-2018 | Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram. |
1. An Editor of “The Indian Express” aggrieved by the dismissal of the criminal revision petition by the Sessions Court refusing to quash the summons issued in the above-captioned complaint filed for criminal defamation, had come up before this Court by filing the present petition under Section 482 CrPC.
2. As per paragraph 2 of the petition, the petitioner declares that he was working as Editor (Chandigarh) of “The Indian Express” (Chandigarh Edition), printed and published by The Indian Express Private Limited, and at that time, the petitioner was a resident of Chandigarh and now, a resident of Panchkula.
3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the issuance of summons and the upholding of the said order by the Sessions Court in the above-captioned complaint filed by the respondent, Mr. Param Vir Rathee, IPS, against man
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
