SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1740

AMARJOT BHATTI
Balkar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sucha Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. R.K. Arya, Mr. Naresh Jain

Judgment

Ms. Amarjot Bhatti, J.

The petitioner – Balkar Singh has filed the present civil revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the judgment dated 01.07.2023 passed by learned Appellate Authority, Gurdaspur and ejectment order dated 08.02.2023 passed by learned Rent Controller, Gurdaspur alleging that the impugned orders are based on conjectures and surmises and non appreciation of material evidence available on the record.

2. The facts of the case are that Sucha Singh – respondent (petitioner in the main case) filed petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act for ejectment of respondent from the shop marked as IJKL shown in red dotted lines in the site plan with the boundaries as detailed in the petition, situated at Dadwan Road Dhariwal, Tehsil and District Gurdaspur. The petitioner/landlord submitted that the shop in question was owned by him which was in occupation of the respondent/tenant for the last about 20 years on a monthly rent of Rs.1,000/-. There existed relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties. The respondent/tenant is liable to be ejected from the shop in dispute on the ground of non payment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top