AMARJOT BHATTI
Atam Parkash – Appellant
Versus
Arun Kumar Jain – Respondent
AMARJOT BHATTI, J.
1. The petitioner/tenant – Atam Parkash has filed civil revision against impugned judgment dated 24.04.2013 passed by learned Appellate Authority, Bhiwani vide which the appeal preferred by petitioner/tenant Atam Parkash was dismissed and the ejectment order passed by learned Rent Controller, Bhiwani vide judgment dated 08.05.2012 was upheld.
2. As per the facts of the case, Arun Kumar Jain, the landlord (petitioner in the main case) filed ejectment petition under Section 13 of Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 for the ejectment of respondent Atam Parkash from the demised shop situated at Kesri Bhawan, Railway Road, in front of Gurudwara, Bhiwani (detailed and described in head note of the petition). The said shop was let out to the father of respondent, namely, Chander Bhan at the rate of Rs. 69/- per month for running the business of Welding. Sh. Chander Bhan expired 10 years ago and after his death, the respondent Atam Parkash being his legal heir became tenant in the said shop and in this way, there existed the relationship of landlord and tenant. The petitioner sought the ejectment of the respondent from the said shop firstly on the ground
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.