SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(P&H) 2055

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Karan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Rahul Sharma, Mr. Deepak Grewal DAG, Haryana, Mr. Amitabh Tewari

Table of Content
1. quashing of fir based on compromise between parties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. validity of consent in sexual relations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. high court’s power to quash non-compoundable offences. (Para 8 , 9)
4. no proceedings needed post-compromise. (Para 10 , 11)

Judgment

Mr. Arvind Singh Sangwan, J. (Oral):- By way of the present petition, filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has prayed for quashing of FIR No.61 dated 25.08.2020 under Sections 376 (2)(N) IPC, registered at Women Police Station, District Gurugram and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of the compromise entered into between the parties.

2. Vide order dated 28.09.2020, the parties were directed to appear before the trial Court and the trial Court was directed to record the statements of the parties and submit a report regarding number of persons arrayed as accused in the FIR; whether any accused is proclaimed offender; whether the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence and whether any accused person is involved in any other FIR. The trial Court was also directed to record the statement of the Investigating Officer as to how many vi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top