ALKA SARIN
Babrubhan – Appellant
Versus
Surender Pal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of ownership and possession (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claims and counterclaims by the parties (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. background of trial court proceedings (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's analysis of construction activities (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. legal entitlements of co-owners (Para 10 , 14) |
| 6. judicial interpretations of co-ownership rights (Para 11 , 13 , 15) |
| 7. review of plaintiff’s claims and legal standing (Para 16) |
| 8. conclusion and dismissal of the petition (Para 18) |
Judgment
Mr. Alka Sarin, J.:- The present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the plaintiff-petitioner challenging the order dated 25.06.2020 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Narnaul whereby the order dated 05.06.2020 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Narnaul granting an ad-interim injunction in favour of the plaintiff-petitioner, has been set aside.
2. In brief, the facts relevant to the present lis are that one Rohtas son of Matadin was the owner and in possession of 1/4thshare of land situated in Village Balh Kalan, Tehsil Narnaul, District Mohindergarh, comprised in KhewatNo.112 Khatoni No.173, Killa No.41//12 (8-0) measur
Sant Ram Nagina Ram vs. Daya Ram Nagina Ram
Gangubai Babiya Chaudhary and others V/s Sitaram Bhalchandra Sukhtankar and others etc.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.