Rakesh Das vs State of Haryana - 2024 Supreme(P&H) 327

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(P&H) 327

KULDEEP TIWARI
Rakesh Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Akshay Bhan, Mr. H.P.S. Sandhu, Mr. Harsh Gupta, Mr. Sachin Ohri, Mr. Vimal Kumar Gupta, Mr. Sahil Goyal, Mr. Rohit, Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Mr. Aman Bansal, Ms. Puja Chopra, Mr. Deepam Ragav, Mr. Sanyam Bhardwaj, Mr. D.S. Malja, Mr. Sukhdeep S. Singh, Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Mr. Manit Malhotra, Mr. S.N. Sharma, Mr. M.S. Ganesh, Mr. Harshit Jain, Mr. N.S. Lucky, Mr. L.S. Lakhanpal, Mr. Naveen Bawa, Mr. Pawan Attri, Mr. Vishal Sharma, Mr. Govind Chauhan, Mr. Viney Saini, Mr. J.P. Jangu, Mr. S.S. Maini, Mr. Prince Pushpinder Rana, Mr. Parvesh Malik, Ms. Dimple Sharma, Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Mr. Arjun Dhingra, Mr. Rohit Sharma, Mr. Krishan Kanha, Mr. M.S. Yadav, Mr. Sachin Gupta, Mr. B.S. Saroha, Mr. Vikrant Vij, Mr. G.S. Bawa, Mr. Ankit Aggarwal, Mr. Sankalp Gehlawat, Mr. G.S. Duhan, Mr. K.S. Rawat, Mr. Akhil Sharma, Mr. G.S. Gill, Mr. Abhinav Jain, Mr. Pankaj Bains, Mr. Vishal Pundir, Mr. Gurpreet Kaur Bhatti, Mr. Vidul Kapoor, Mr. Sarvjeet Singh Thakur, Mr. P.S. Ahluwalia Advocate (Amicus Curiae), Mr. Jashandeep Singh, Mr. Digvijay Nagpal AAG, Punjab, Mr. Raghav Garg AAG, Punjab

JUDGMENT :

Kuldeep Tiwari, J.

The amenability of all these petitions for being decided through a common verdict, stems from them being ingrained with common question(s) of law, besides emanates from identical relief(s) being craved to be reaped therein.

2. To be precise, all these petitions strive for partial quashing of FIRs, on the bedrock of partial compromises. There is no wrangle amongst the contesting litigants herein that, FIRs in all these petitions are yearned to be partially quashed, inasmuch as, not all the accused, as nominated in these FIRs, have been impleaded as petitioners therein, rather only some of the accused/petitioners herein, have entered into compromise with the complainant/private respondents concerned. Therefore, for the sake of brevity, the facts are being extracted from CRM-M-48043-2023, titled as “Rakesh Das V/s State of Haryana and Anr.”.

PRAYER CLAUSE (IN CRM-M-48043-2023)

3. The instant petition aims at securing the relief of quashing of FIR No.89 dated 27.02.2015, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the IPC, registered at P.S. DLF Phase-II, Gurugram, along with all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the basis of Compromise dat