IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUMEET GOEL, J.
Balwinder Singh Sandhu – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRM-M No. 62189 of 2023
Decided On : 21-05-2024
Quashing - FIR under IPC - IPC 498-A - The court quashed the FIR under Section 498-A of IPC, interpreting the allegations as civil in nature and lacking the necessary ingredients of the offence.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR registered under Section 498-A IPC by their daughter-in-law, alleging eviction from their ancestral home, which the police later found to lack sufficient grounds for criminal charges.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the FIR did not disclose any criminal offence under Section 498-A IPC, as the allegations were primarily civil disputes regarding living arrangements.
Issues: Whether the FIR under Section 498-A IPC was maintainable given the nature of the allegations and the findings of the police investigation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that allegations must meet the legal criteria for criminal offences, and in this case, the FIR was based on civil grievances rather than criminal conduct.
Result: The FIR and all related proceedings were quashed.
JUDGMENT :
SUMEET GOEL, J.
1. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 148 dated 07.09.2015 registered at Police Station City South Moga, District Moga, Punjab under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
2. Perusal of the above-mentioned FIR shows that it was registered on behest of the complainant who is daughter-in-law of the petitioners. A thorough reading of the allegations in the FIR makes it clear that the main thrust of the allegations in the FIR is that she as well as her husband (son of the petitioners-accused) are not being permitted by the petitioners to live in their ancestral house. It is alleged in the FIR that in the month of April, 2014 the complainant and her husband were forcibly evicted from their ancestral house by the petitioners, but three months past thereafter, they were again taken back into the house by the petitioners. However, on 16.05.2015 when the husband of the complainant was away to Patiala, she was again moved out of the house by petitioners, and her mother took her along to her parental home. The final request made to the police in the FIR is that the complainant and her husband be put back in the house of the petitioners, which is alleged to be their joint property.
3. In the initial complaint made to the police the complainant had named her father-in-law, mother-in-law, and sister-in-law as accused. However, prior to registration of the abovementioned FIR, it seems a preliminary enquiry was conducted by the police. During the said enquiry the police concluded that marriage of complainant was performed with son of petitioners, and the said alliance between the parties was made through Dera Sacha Sauda, their religious sect. It was concluded by the police that since the petitioners were not happy with the dowry received in the marriage and as such were pressurizing their son to divorce the complainant. As such the police recommended for the registration of FIR against the petitioners under Section 498-A of the IPC. Sister-in-law of the complainant was found innocent by the police and no action was recommended against her.
4. In the above circumstances the above-mentioned FIR came to be registered against the petitioners. In final report filed by the police under Section 173 of the Cr.P.C., after due investigation, the police concluded that no offence under Section 498-A of IPC is made out against the petitioners, and that the FIR was wrongly registered against the petitioners. Accordingly, the report seeking cancellation of the FIR was filed by the Police, in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moga.
5. The said cancellation report filed by the police was rejected by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moga on 22.02.2021 by passing the following order:
The court established that civil disputes cannot be transformed into criminal offences under Section 498-A IPC without sufficient evidence of criminal conduct.
The court emphasized that the allegations, if proved, constitute an offence and should be decided in a trial, and that the court cannot appreciate evidence while considering a petition for quashing c....
False criminal proceeding cannot be allowed to continue.
The pendency of a civil proceeding does not automatically end a criminal proceeding, and specific allegations of harassment and demand of dowry warrant further investigation.
The court emphasized the requirement of prima facie evidence to constitute an offence and cautioned against interference when the facts prima facie constitute an offence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.