Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Section 4 Official Secrets Act Presumption and Prima Facie Evidence Bar Bail in Espionage Case: Punjab & Haryana HC
14 Mar 2026
Centre Revokes Wangchuk's NSA Detention Amid SC Challenge
14 Mar 2026
No Interference Allowed in Religious Prayers on Private Premises: Allahabad HC Cites Maranatha Precedent
14 Mar 2026
No Proof of Absolute Ownership by Mizo Chiefs Bars Fundamental Rights Claim Under Article 31: Supreme Court
14 Mar 2026
PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTA
Shilpa – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER
1. By invoking the inherent power of this Court, the present petition u/S 482 of Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the applicants, seeking quashment of FIR registered at Crime No.354/2013 by P/S Bhawarkuan, Distt - Indore for the offences u/S 498-A, 34, 323 and 506 of IPC against the applicants.
2. Facts leading to filing of present petition, in short, are that complainant/respondent No.2 Smt. Prachi Gupta has lodged the FIR at P/S Bhawarkuan. on 2.4.2023 to the effect that her marriage was solemnized with applicant No.5 Ankit Goyal, on 9.12.2016 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Applicant No.1 – 3 are sisters-in-law and applicant No.4 is fatherin-law of the complainant. Since marriage of the complainant and till 20.12.2016, her sisters-in-law Shilpa and Neha used to live with her and Aditi used to live there only as she was not married. The sister-in-law and husband of the deceased started to taunt her and torture her in furtherance of demand of dowry. Complainant was pushed out of her matrimonial home at night several times and on tell
Specific evidence and details are essential in allegations of harassment and dowry demands for justifying the continuation of legal proceedings.
The court upheld that specific allegations in the FIR constituted a prima facie case for dowry demands and harassment, warranting continuation of proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.