SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 588

MANISHA BATRA
Sukhwinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kamaljit Kaur – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : D.S. Malwai.
For the Respondent: Vipin Mahajan.

JUDGMENT :

MANISHA BATRA, J.

1. The instant appeal has been filed by the appellants challenging the order dated 06.11.2023, whereby an application for grant of pre-arrest bail filed by the appellants was dismissed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur on the ground that Section 18 of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short ‘the SC/ST Act’) created a bar for grant of anticipatory bail.

2. Brief facts of the case relevant for the purpose of disposal of the present appeal are that the respondent had filed a complaint against the present appellants alleging therein that her husband has been allotted a five Marla plot by the Gram Panchayat of the village. The appellant No. 4-Randhir Singh, who has no right, title or interest over the above said plot, along with the other appellants tried to encroach upon the plot owned by her husband in the evening of 24.07.2017 and started ploughing the same with a tractor which was driven by the appellant No. 1. Coming to know about this fact, the respondent along with some other persons who were also allottees of the adjacent plots rushed towards the plot and requested the appellants

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top