SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1899

JAISHREE THAKUR
Sudhir Kant – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Faridkot Division, Faridkot – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Ravish Bansal.
For the Respondents: Mr. Deepanjay Sharma, DAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT :

(Jaishree Thakur, J.)

The instant writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking to challenge the order dated 06.10.2016 (Annexure P3) passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner-cum-Collector, Bathinda (hereinafter referred to as the Collector) whereby, the petitioners have been directed to pay an additional amount of Rs.2,00,500/- along with interest @ 12% from the date of registration of the sale deed till the deposit of the amount towards deficient stamp duty and registration fee pertaining to sale deed registered on 22.09.2010 and the order dated 27.11.2018 (Annexure P5) passed by the Commissioner, Faridkot Division, Faridkot, affirming the order of the Collector.

2. In brief, the facts as stated are that the petitioners purchased land measuring 310 square yards equivalent to 6 biswas situated at Patti Mehna, Bathinda as per jamabandi for the year 2002-03. A sum of Rs.93,000/- was paid towards stamp duty, registration fee etc. The sale deed was registered by the Sub-Registrar, Bathinda and at that time, the sale deed was not impounded on account of inadequate stamp duty. The sale deed was returned to the petitioners after r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top