SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1879

JAISHREE THAKUR
Shree Krishna Enterprise – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Vikas Bishnoi, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Tapan Kumar Yadav, DAG, Haryana., for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Jaishree Thakur, J. (Oral) - The instant petition has been filed seeking to challenge the order dated 13.02.2013 passed by respondent No.2-City Magistrate-cum-Collector, Hisar (hereinafter referred to as the Collector) whereby the petitioner has been directed to pay an additional amount of Rs.11,22,375/- in lieu of deficit stamp duty pertaining to sale deed registered on 24.04.2009 and the order dated 08.07.2014 passed by the Commissioner, Hisar Division, Hisar affirming the order of the Collector.

2. In brief, the facts are that the petitioner-Firm had purchased land measuring 48 kanals 0 marla from one Umed Singh son of Tirkha Ram vide registered sale deed No.531 dated 24.04.2009 for a consideration of Rs.1,20,00,000/-. The petitioner-Firm originally had five partners and the partnership deed was reduced into writing on 17.02.2009, which was registered by Registrar of Firms on 24.02.2009. Thereafter, vide partnership deed dated 24.04.2009, the number of partners were increased to 20. On 14.07.2009, the partnership firm was dissolved vide a dissolution deed and Balwan Singh son of Manohar Lal became sole proprietor of the firm. On 16.07.2009, a partition deed was executed a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top