SANJAY VASHISTH
Prahlad Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sewak Ram – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. agreement to sell and its validity. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. chronology of events and witness testimonies. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's reasoning on evidence and doubts. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. dismissal of appeal due to lack of merit. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT :
(Sanjay Vashisth, J.)
CM-7403-C-2019
For the reasons set out in the application, the same is allowed. Consequently, the delay of 117 days in re-filing the accompanying appeal is condoned.
RSA-2679-2019
1. The present appeal has been filed by the plaintiff-Prahlad Singh (appellant herein) against the concurrent findings qua the dismissal of the suit filed by him.
2. Civil Suit No.379-CS, was instituted by plaintiff-Prahlad Singh against the defendant-Sewak Ram (respondent herein), for seeking a decree for possession by way of specific performance. In the said suit, plaintiff pleaded that defendant being owner of the house constructed over plot measuring 5 Marla consisting of two rooms, latrine, bathroom and boundary wall, situated within the Lal Laqir of Khan Mohammad, Fatehabad, Tehsil & District Fatehabad (for brevity, 'the house in question'), entered into an agreement to sell dated 08.04.2013, with the plaintiff for its sale i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.