SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1874

SANJAY VASHISTH
Prahlad Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sewak Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. S.P. Arora.

Table of Content
1. agreement to sell and its validity. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. chronology of events and witness testimonies. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's reasoning on evidence and doubts. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. dismissal of appeal due to lack of merit. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT :

(Sanjay Vashisth, J.)

CM-7403-C-2019

For the reasons set out in the application, the same is allowed. Consequently, the delay of 117 days in re-filing the accompanying appeal is condoned.

RSA-2679-2019

1. The present appeal has been filed by the plaintiff-Prahlad Singh (appellant herein) against the concurrent findings qua the dismissal of the suit filed by him.

2. Civil Suit No.379-CS, was instituted by plaintiff-Prahlad Singh against the defendant-Sewak Ram (respondent herein), for seeking a decree for possession by way of specific performance. In the said suit, plaintiff pleaded that defendant being owner of the house constructed over plot measuring 5 Marla consisting of two rooms, latrine, bathroom and boundary wall, situated within the Lal Laqir of Khan Mohammad, Fatehabad, Tehsil & District Fatehabad (for brevity, 'the house in question'), entered into an agreement to sell dated 08.04.2013, with the plaintiff for its sale i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top