IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
B.S.Walia, J.
Harminder Pal Singh – Petitioner
Versus
Palvinder Singh- Respondent
CR No.1279 of 2023
Decided On : 27-02-2023
JUDGMENT :
B.S.Walia, J.
Prayer in the instant petition is for the issuance of directions to the learned Appellate Authority-IX, Jalandhar, to decide appeal bearing CNR No.PBJL01049962022C, CIS No.RA/106/2022, titled as Harminder Pal Singh vs. Palwinder Singh etc., within a stipulated period of time and in the meantime to stay the operation of order Annexure P5 dated 09.11.2022, passed by the learned Rent Controller, Jalandhar.
2. A perusal of order Annexure P5 reveals that ejectment petition filed against the petitioner was allowed vide order dated 09.11.2022 and the petitioner was directed to vacate the demised premises within one month from the date of order. Learned counsel contends that thereafter the petitioner filed appeal, Annexure P6 before the learned District Judge, Jalandhar, on 18.11.2022, in which, notice was issued. Learned counsel contends that the main appeal is listed for final arguments on 14.03.2023 while the execution proceedings are pending before the learned Executing Court for 02.03.2023, but till date no orders have been passed on the application for stay filed by the petitioner by the learned Appellate Authority-IX, Jalandhar.
3. A perusal of Order 21 Rule 26 CPC reveals that the court to which a decree has been sent for execution shall, upon sufficient cause being shown, stay the execution of such decree for a reasonable time, to enable the judgment debtor to apply to the court by which the decree was passed, or to any court having appellate jurisdiction in respect of the decree or the execution thereof, for an order to stay execution, or for any other order relating to the decree or execution which might have been made by such court of first instance or Appellate Court if execution had been issued thereby, or if application for execution had been made thereto. Order 21 Rule 26 CPC reads as under:-
(1) The court to which a decree has been sent for execution shall, upon sufficient cause being shown, stay the execution of such decree for a reasonable time, to enable the judgment debtor to apply to the court by which the decree was passed, or to any court having appellate jurisdiction in respect of the decree or the execution thereof, for an Order to stay execution, or for any other order relating to the decree or execution which might have been made by such court of first instance or Appellate Court if execution had been issued thereby, or if application for execution had been made thereto,
(2) Where the property or person of the judgment debtor has been seized under an execution, the court which issued the execution may order the restitution of such property or the discharge of such person pending the result of the application.
(3) Power to require security from, or Impose conditions upon, judgment debtor:-Before making an order to stay execution or for the restitution of property or the discharge of the judgment debtor, the court shall require such security from, or impose such conditions upon, the judgment debtor as it thinks fit. "
4. Learned counsel contends that although perusal of zimni order dated 01.12.2022, reveals that the learned Appellate Authority-IX, Jalandhar, while receiving the appeal by entrustment recorded that there were arguable points in the appeal and admitted the same for hearing subject to all just exceptions, yet no order was passed on the application for stay filed along with the appeal and since the appeal is now listed for final hearing on 14.03.2023, therefore, if stay is not granted, great prejudice would be caused to the petitioner, in the eventuality of the appeal being allowed.
5. Learned counsel relies upon the decision of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Mool Chand Yadav and another vs. Raza Buland Sugar Company Ltd. Rampur and others 1982(3) SCC 484, to contend that the order of the learned Rent Controller directing the petitioner to handover vacant possession of the demised premises entails serious civil consequences and once the appeal has
Mool Chand Yadav & another Vs. Raza Buland Sugar Company
Mool Chand Yadav and another vs. Raza Buland Sugar Company Ltd. Rampur and others 1982(3) SCC 484
In judicial proceedings involving ejectment under Rent Act, execution orders should be stayed during appeals to prevent serious civil consequences and ensure fair trial.
Execution of an eviction order may be stayed pending appeal to prevent making the appeal infructuous.
Court emphasizes the necessity of expediting stay applications to ensure fair access to justice in execution proceedings.
The main legal point established is that the stay application should be decided before the execution of an eviction order to prevent substantial prejudice to the rights of the party against whom the ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.