IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
B.S. WALIA, J.
Kashmira Singh - Petitioner
Versus
M/s.Mohinder Singh Kahlon & Sons - Respondent
CR No.1193 of 2023 (O&M)
Decided On : 22-02-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to stay order based on appeal pending. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel's reliance on legal precedent. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis on stay of execution. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. stay granted pending appeal decision. (Para 8) |
| 5. revision petition disposed with directions. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT :
B.S. Walia, J.
Challenge in the instant petition is to order (Annexure P7) dated 07.11.2022 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Samrala, dismissing the application filed by the petitioner/Judgment debtor for staying execution in view of pendency of appeal filed by the petitioner against judgment and decree dated 19.03.2019 in Civil Suit No.52 of 2016 wherein the suit for recovery filed by the respondents-plaintiffs was decreed.
2. A perusal of order (Annexure P7) reveals that the application for stay of execution till the decision of the appeal pending before the Court of the learned Addl. District Judge, Ludihana, was dismissed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Samrala, on the ground that mere pendency of the civil appeal was no ground for staying the proceedings.
3. Learned Counsel relies upon the decision of this Court in 'Harish Chander and another versus Surinder Kaur', CR No.38 of 2023, decided on 11.01.2023.
4. I have considered the submission of learned counsel.
5. A perusal of Order 21 Rule 26 CPC reveals that the court to which a decree has been sent for execution shall, upon sufficient cause being shown, stay the execution of such decree for a reasonable time, to enable the judgment debtor to apply to the court by which the decree was passed, or to any court having appellate jurisdiction in respect of the decree or the execution thereof, for an order to stay execution, or for any other order relating to the decree or execution which might have been made by such court of first instance or Appellate Court if execution had been issued thereby, or if application for execution had been made thereto.
Order 21 Rule 26 CPC reads as under:-
(2) Where the property or person of the judgment debtor has been seized under an execution, the court which issued the execution may order the restitution of such property or the discharge of such person pending the result of the application.
(3) Power to require security from, or Impose conditions upon, judgment debtor:- Before making an order to stay execution or for the restitution of property or the discharge of the judgment debtor, the court shall require such security from, or impose such conditions upon, the judgment debtor as it thinks fit. "
6. Learned Counsel contends that although application for stay had been moved before the learned Addl. District Judge, Ludhiana, yet notice was issued in the appeal only and the case is now listed for final arguments on 11.04.2023, therefore, if stay is not granted till the decision of the appeal, great prejudice would be caused to the petitioners in the eventuality of the appeal being allowed.
7. Reference on the point in issue can be made to the decision of a co-ordinate bench of this Court in case titled as 'Ashwani Kumar Bindra versus Satish Kumar and another' dated 13.12.2017 in CR No.8745 of 2017. Relevant extract of the same is reproduced as under:-
Mere pendency of an appeal does not stay execution proceedings unless explicitly ordered by the appellate court, as per Order 41 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
A stay of execution in civil proceedings can be granted during the pendency of an appeal when sufficient cause is shown, pursuant to Order 21 Rule 26 of the CPC.
Mere pendency of appeal does not stay execution under Order 41 Rule 5(1) CPC unless expressly ordered.
In judicial proceedings involving ejectment under Rent Act, execution orders should be stayed during appeals to prevent serious civil consequences and ensure fair trial.
The executing court cannot stay execution of its own decree; such authority lies with the appellate court.
The Executing Court may dismiss a stay application made incorrectly; an ex-parte decree is valid until set aside in the originating court.
Order 21 Rule 29 CPC applies only when both the execution proceedings and the suit between the decree-holder and judgment debtor are pending before the same Court. Section 151 CPC cannot be used to s....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.