SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2622

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ALKA SARIN, J.
Raminder Kaur & Anr. – Petitioners
Versus
Baba Deep Singh Ji Shahid Charitable Society & Ors. – Respondents
CR-2063 of 2008 (O&M)
Decided On : 16-01-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Aeshna Jain, Advocate; For the Petitioners
Mr. B.S. Bedi, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4.

Headnote:(A) Waqf Act, 1995 - Sections 83 and 85 - Jurisdiction of Waqf Tribunal - The plaintiff sought a permanent injunction and mandatory injunction regarding possession of waqf property - The Supreme Court reaffirmed the necessity of Waqf Tribunal jurisdiction over disputes concerning waqf property and beneficiaries - Civil courts cannot entertain such matters. (Para 3, 4)

Facts of the case:
The suit was originally filed by the plaintiffs for permanent injunction concerning land, later converted to a request for mandatory injunction after alleged dispossession, challenging Tribunal's jurisdiction.

Findings of Court:
The Court found that the property is waqf property and affirmed the Waqf Tribunal's jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes related to the property.

Issues: The primary issue is whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction over the waqf property dispute and the nature of the plaintiff's claim as a beneficiary.

Ratio Decidendi: The ruling clarifies that disputes involving waqf properties must be resolved by the Waqf Tribunal as mandated by the Waqf Act, not civil courts.

Result: Revision petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. nature and jurisdiction over wakf property disputes (Para 1)
2. court’s confirmation of tribunal jurisdiction (Para 2 , 4)
3. importance of waqf tribunal jurisdiction (Para 3)
4. dismissal of the revision petition (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

Alka Sarin, J. (Oral)

In the present case, the plaintiff-respondents filed a suit for permanent injunction for restraining the defendant-petitioners from interfering in their peaceful and lawful possession over the suit land measuring 5 kanals 16 marlas. Thereafter, since the plaintiff-respondents were stated to have been dispossessed, the suit was converted into a suit for mandatory injunction for handing over the vacant possession of the suit land. Vide order dated 28.03.2007 the District Judge, Jalandhar put up the matter before the Tribunal under the WAKF ACT , 1995. The matter was, thereafter, decided vide order dated 26.09.2007 by the Tribunal. Challenge in the present case is to the order passed by the Tribunal on the ground that the Tribunal did not have the jurisdiction to hear the case.

2. Heard.

3. Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Rashid Wali Beg v. Farid Pindari & Ors. [2021 (4) RCR (Civil) 718] has held as under :

    "56. In the case on hand, the property is admitted to be a waqf property. Therefore, to allow the plaintiff to ignore the Waqf Tribunal and to seek a decree of permanent injunction and mandatory injunction from a civil court, would be ignore the mandate of section 83 and 85 which speak of any dispute, question or other matter relating to a waqf or a waqf property. There is also one more issue. In the written statement, the Defendant No.1 has admitted the existence of the waqf and also admitted that the father of the plaintiff by name Riyaz Ahmad is the mutawalli. But the claim of the plaintiff that he is the beneficiary of the waqf has been denied. Therefore, a question as to the nature of the waqf and whether the plaintiff is a beneficiary of the waqf, has also arisen in this case. This question has necessarily to be decided by the Tribunal and not the civil court."

4. In the present case, the undisputed fact is that the property is the wakf property. In view thereof, it cannot be said that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction.

5. In view of the above, the present revision petition is accordingly dismissed. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top