SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2600

AMARJOT BHATTI
Alla Singh Since Deceased Through Lrs – Appellant
Versus
Avinash Kaur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sanjeev Goyal, Advocate; For the Petitioners
Mr. Varun Jain, Advocate with Mr. Kanish Jindal, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT

Amarjot Bhatti, J. (Oral)

The petitioner - Alla Singh now represented through legal heir through its Special Power of Attorney Holder filed civil revision against impugned order dated 19.10.2021, Annexure P-1, passed in appeal No.63 of 2016 titled as Avinash Kaur v. Alla Singh and another, passed by learned Additional District Judge, Sangrur whereby the application filed by the petitioner directing the respondent No.1/plaintiff/appellant to pay deficient stamp duty along with penalty pertaining to agreement to sell dated 04.03.2005, has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the plaintiff/respondent No.1 Avinash Kaur filed civil suit No.314 of 2006 for specific performance of agreement to sell dated 04.03.2005 against Alla Singh (since deceased). In the plaint it was specifically mentioned that the possession of the property was delivered to her by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top