Back
ANIL KSHETARPAL
Khushwinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fundamental facts of recruitment controversy. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. legal challenges and court orders on selection process. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. rules and instructions regarding sports gradation certificates. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. allegation of failure by departmental selection committee. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. arguments on rules and judicial precedents analyzed. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. judgment quashing selection list and concluding order. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT
Mr. Anil Kshetarpal, J.
After having heard the learned counsel representing the parties at length and on perusal of the various paper books, this court is of the considered opinion that the following question arises for adjudication:-
2. In order to comprehend the controversy involved, it is imperative to acknowledge the fundamental facts involved.
3. The Department of Jails
Court directed authorities to consider petitioner's application for Junior Engineer post after quashing charge sheet against him, ensuring fair recruitment process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
