ANOOP CHITKARA
Mandeep Kumar @ Mani – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mr. Anoop Chitkara, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 51 | 11.06.2019 | DeraBaba Nanak, District Batala, Gurdaspur, Punjab | 323, 324, 341, 148, 149 IPC ( Section 326 IPC added later on) |
The petitioners, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved person.
2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2.
3. After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, impleading the aggrieved person as respondent.
4. On 26.05.2022, the aggrieved person-Simratpal Singh @ Simrat Singh (respondent No.2) appeared before the learned JMIC, Batala and stated that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 02.06.2022, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings without any threat.
Analysis & Reasoning:
5. Despite the severe opposition
Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Laxmi Narayan (2019) 5 SCC 688
Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466
ParbatbhaiAahir v. State of Gujarat
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the inherent powers of the High Court under section 482 CrPC can be invoked to quash the prosecution even in cases where the offences are non-....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the High Court can quash the prosecution for non-compoundable offences based on a compromise, considering the nature of the offence, societ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's authority to quash FIR and consequent proceedings based on a compromise, considering the nature of the offences and the impact on publi....
The court can invoke the inherent jurisdiction under section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences if the settlement is voluntary and in the interest of justice, considering the impact on publi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the exercise of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash the FIR and consequent proceedings, especially in cases where the offenses are non-c....
The main legal point established is that the exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can justify quashing non-compoundable offences to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the p....
The main legal point established is that the inherent powers of the court under section 482 CrPC can be invoked to quash non-compoundable offences based on a settlement between the parties, consideri....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.