Back
ANOOP CHITKARA
Gurpreet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J. -
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 46 | 28.03.2018 | Navi Baradari, District Police Commissionerate Jalandhar | 323 IPC and 75 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 |
The Petitioner, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, has come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved person.
2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2.
3. After that, the Petitioner came up before this Court to quash the FIR and in the quashing petition, impleading the aggrieved person as Respondent.
4. On 31.10.2022, the aggrieved person Balbir Kaur (R-2) and Fatehdeep Singh @ Mantek Singh @ Jasjot Singh appeared before the JMIC, Jalandhar and stated that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 21.11.2022, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings without any threat.
Analysis & Reasoning:
5.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the High Court can quash the prosecution for non-compoundable offences based on a compromise, considering the nature of the offence, societ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the inherent powers of the High Court under section 482 CrPC can be invoked to quash the prosecution even in cases where the offences are non-....
The main legal point established is that the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C can be used to quash proceedings based on a compromise, even for non-compoundable offences, if it serves the ends ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's authority to quash FIR and consequent proceedings based on a compromise, considering the nature of the offences and the impact on publi....
The main legal point established is that the inherent power under section 482 CrPC can be invoked to quash non-compoundable offences based on a compromise, considering the nature of the offence, the ....
The court can invoke the inherent jurisdiction under section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences if the settlement is voluntary and in the interest of justice, considering the impact on publi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
