SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2487

ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Rajpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harbans Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Abhishek Lubana, Advocate; For the Petitioner

JUDGMENT

Anupinder Singh Grewal, J. (Oral)

The petitioner has challenged the order dated 13.12.2021 (Annexure P-2) whereby an application filed by the respondents under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC was allowed while setting aside the ex parte judgment and decree dated 06.11.2015 (Annexure P-3).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the defendants/respondents had been served through proper mode of service inasmuch as the publication was also made in the newspaper Chardikala and therefore, the ex parte decree should not have been set aside especially when the application had been preferred by the defendants after three years.

3. Heard.

4. The petitioner/plaintiff had filed a suit against the respondents/defendants, who include his father and sisters to the effect that he is the joint owner in joint possession being coparcener in the land in question. The suit had been decreed ex parte on 06.11.2015 (Annexure P-3). The address of defendant No.1 had been mentioned as village Mangat, Tehsil Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur but it had come on record that he was not residing at that address. He is stated to be residing at village Argowal, Tehsil Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur. The other defend

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top