ARUN MONGA
Surjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Swarn Kaur – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arun Monga, J. (Oral)
CM-2066-C-2020
Allowed as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions.
Main case (O&M)
For convenience, parties herein are addressed as per the recitals before learned trial Court.
2. Having suffered concurrent adverse findings by the two Courts below, appellants/plaintiffs are in second appeal before this Court assailing learned trial Court judgment and decree dated 26.07.2016, as upheld by learned First Appellate Court vide its judgment and decree dated 18.11.2019, dismissing the suit for declaration filed by plaintiffs to the effect that on the basis of Regd. Will dated 20.01.2000 executed by late Sh. Mewa Singh son of Sh. Mangal Singh, plaintiffs and defendants No.1 and 2 are co-sharears/ co-owners in joint possession in equal shares of suit property.
3. Briefly stated, facts, as noticed by learned Courts, are as below:
A proponent of a Will must dispel any suspicious circumstances surrounding its execution; mere assertion is insufficient to establish validity.
A Will's validity hinges on proving its proper execution and attestation; mere failure to favor certain heirs does not indicate suspicious circumstances.
The validity of a will is undermined when it is executed under suspicious circumstances, necessitating the propounder to dispel these doubts for the document to be accepted legally.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the fulfillment of legal requirements for proving a Will and the production of sufficient evidence to remove suspicious circumstances, thereby upho....
The propounder of a Will must dispel any suspicious circumstances surrounding its execution to establish its validity.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.