Back
AVNEESH JHINGAN
Sant Sunder Dass Rice and General Mill – Appellant
Versus
Punjab State Civil Supplies Corp. Ltd. (Punsup) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. miller failed to shell paddy. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding agreement clauses. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. interpretation of agreement clauses. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. analysis of clauses 8 and 9. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. conclusion: appeal dismissed. (Para 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
Avneesh Jhingan, J. (Oral)
M/s Sant Sunder Dass Rice and General Mill (hereinafter referred to as 'the miller') is in appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, 'the Act').
2. The relevant facts are that Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'PUNSUP') on 30.11.2000 entered into an agreement with the miller for shelling of paddy for the crop year 2000-01. Paddy in 41663 bags weighing 20831.50 quintals was issued and the miller failed to shell the entire paddy. The arbitration proceedings initiated at the instance of PUNSUP culminated in award dated 18.5.2005. PUNSUP was held entitled to recover Rs 64,56,837/- along with interest at the agreed rate of 21% w.e.f. 1.8.2012 till the date of award and further interest @ 18% on the total amount from the date of award till realization.
3. The objections filed by miller under
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an arbitration clause conferring exclusive right on one party to appoint the arbitrator cannot be enforced, and the court has the jurisdiction....
The court has jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator when an arbitration clause is unenforceable due to exclusivity in appointing rights, ensuring that disputes are resolved effectively.
The interpretation of contractual clauses by an Arbitrator cannot be interfered with unless it is unreasonable or against settled legal principles.
Claims arising under arbitration agreements must adhere to stipulated limitation periods, and prior satisfaction accepted by a creditor bars reopening such claims.
The amended procedural provisions of the Arbitration Act are applicable retrospectively to pending arbitral proceedings, and interference by the court is limited to cases of exceptional rarity or cle....
Recovery proceedings under the Telangana Revenue Recovery Act cannot be initiated without a prior determination of the amount due, especially when disputes exist and an arbitration clause is present.
An arbitration agreement exists despite challenges, and an independent arbitrator must be appointed due to conflicts of interest with the originally named arbitrator.
Arbitrability of claims hinges on adherence to procedural agreements; claimants can seek interest despite contractual prohibitions, reflecting arbitral authority.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
