G. S. SANDHAWALIA, LAPITA BANERJI
Commissioner of Central Excise & Service, Delhi – Appellant
Versus
A. K. Singh, Director – Respondent
JUDGMENT
G.S. Sandhawalia, J.
The present two appeals are directed against the orders dated 27.08.2018 (Annexure A-9) passed by Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESAT) wherein vide common order, the appeals of the Director of the Company, M/s Pelican Tobacco Co. Ltd. were restored without payment of necessary pre-deposit under the provisions of section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1954 which was waived off vide order dated 24.10.2018 (Annexure A-10) and thereafter allowed on merits on 01.04.2019 (Annexure A-11).
2. In our considered opinion, the following question of law would arise for consideration:
The CESTAT exceeded its jurisdiction by restoring appeals without compliance with mandatory pre-deposit requirements under the Central Excise Act.
The requirement of pre-deposit under Section 129E of the Customs Act is mandatory, with limited discretion for waiver in exceptional circumstances, reaffirmed by recent judicial precedents.
The court upheld the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, emphasizing that financial hardship does not justify waiver of this requirement.
Point of law: Order of the Tribunal, dismissing the appeal for non compliance of the mandatory pre-deposit, has to be upheld and the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
The approval of a resolution plan under the IBC extinguishes all claims not included in the plan, thereby entitling the petitioner to a refund of pre-deposits made during appeals against extinguished....
Pre-deposit in appeals can be validated even if made under a different head when procedural defects arise due to administrative issues.
There is always peril in treating the words of a speech or judgment as though they are words in a legislative enactment, and it is to be remembered that judicial utterances made in the setting of the....
The court ruled that interest is payable on delayed refund of pre-deposit after three months from the application date, as pre-deposits do not equate to duty or penalty payments.
The court held that claims involving CENVAT credits were extinguished post-approval of the resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, reaffirming jurisdictional limits of the High Cour....
Provisions of Section 11B that it governs refund of duty and interest from the relevant date and not penalty. Considering the provisions of Section 11B (supra), I find that the amount of penalty paid....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.