Back
G. S. SANDHAWALIA, HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN
State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Ved Prakash – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Harpreet Kaur Jeewan, J. - CM-764-LPA-2019
Application has been filed for condonation of delay of 695 days in filing the appeal against the judgment dated 17.02.2017 of the learned Single Judge.
Notice of the same application was issued on 25.02.2019 but no reply has been filed by the respondent till now.
Keeping in view the facts mentioned in the application and in view of the supporting affidavit, sufficient cause has been made out to condone the delay. Resultantly, the present application is allowed and the delay of 695 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned.
CM stands disposed of.
LPA-344-2019 (O&M)
Challenge in the present Letters Patent Appeal is to the order dated 17.02.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP-20848-2014, titled Ved Parkash v. State of Punjab and others, which has been disposed of in terms of the order dated 08.02.2017 passed in CWP-8346-2015, titled Asha Rani v. Commissioner. Jallandhar Division and another.
2. Learned counsel for the appellants-State submitted that the respondent purchased a plot measuring 01 kanal and 06 maria, vide sale deed No. 7458, dated 22.02.2012. The said sale deed was impounded by the Sub-Registrar, Bamala, and i
The necessity of conducting a spot inspection before determining stamp duty to ensure assessments are based on factual evidence rather than presumptions.
The Collector must follow due process and provide notice before determining stamp duty; reliance on ex-parte inspections without evidence contravenes procedural laws.
Point of Law : Person presenting the instrument is required to disclose the nature of economic activity, industrial development, if any, prevailing in the locality where the property is situated and ....
The court ruled that valuation procedures under the Indian Stamp Act must follow due process and be supported by substantiated evidence; arbitrary enhancements without proper procedure are legally un....
The authority must provide a prima facie basis for suspecting undervaluation under Section 47A, and any revaluation must be justified and not arbitrary.
The registering authority cannot re-evaluate paid stamp duty on agricultural land based on intended future use, reaffirming the original market value at the time of purchase.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
