SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2713

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, JJ.
Court On Its Own Motion – Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CWP-PIL-29 of 2021 (O&M)
Decided On : 03-11-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. R.S. Khosla, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sarvesh Malik, Advocate (Amicus Curiae).
For the Respondent: Mr. Arjun Sheoran, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Punjab, Mr. Pawan Girdhar, Addl. AG, Haryana.
Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Sr. Panel Counsel with Mr. Sahil Garg, Advocate for the respondent-UOI.
Mr. Manish Bansal, Public Prosecutor and Mr. J.S. Toor, Additional Public Prosecutor, U.T. Chandigarh.
Mr. Rajeev Anand, Advocate for Respondent-CBI.
Mr. Pankaj Bains, Advocate; For the Appellant in CM-78-CWPIL-20

The Court can invoke Article 226 to quash numerous cases filed under Section 188 IPC during the COVID-19 pandemic to alleviate judicial congestion, emphasizing an equitable approach rather than selective case handling.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 188, 354, 354A, 354B, 342, 506, 186, 323, 511, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Multiple FIRs and status reports were reviewed, revealing numerous cases pending due to extraordinary circumstances during COVID-19 pandemic that may affect judicial efficiency. The need for systemic review of such cases' legitimacy was highlighted to relieve court congestion. (Paras 1-10)

Facts of the case:
The Court reviewed multiple FIRs from Punjab and U.T. Chandigarh involving various serious charges, noting individuals facing dismissal of cases and ongoing investigations, especially concerning those filed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Findings of Court:
The Court directed for status reports regarding cases pending under Section 188 IPC during the pandemic to assess whether prolonged proceedings are justifiable and to consider possible quashing of cases across the board.

Issues: The principal concern was evaluating the legitimacy of numerous cases registered under Section 188 IPC during the COVID-19 pandemic and their impact on the judicial system.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court emphasized initiating a full examination of cases related to COVID-19 protocols to relieve clogging of the judicial system rather than addressing individual cases selectively, thus promoting equitable justice.

Result: The Court ordered the submission of status reports from the states on the number and circumstances of pending cases by the next hearing date.

Table of Content
1. overview of various firs and their status (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. concerns about pending cases from covid-19 (Para 9)
3. request for additional status report (Para 10)
4. adjournment and instructions for next hearing (Para 11)

JUDGMENT

Status report by way of affidavit of Shri Raj Kumar Singh (IPS), Inspector General of Police, U.T. Chandigarh has been filed on behalf of respondent No.4.

2. Mr. Toor has pointed out that in view of the earlier directions issued on 21.07.2023 the challan in FIR No.168 dated 31.12.2022 registered under Sections 354 , 354A, 354B, 342 and 506 IPC was presented on 25.08.2023 and now case is fixed for consideration on charge. It is also pointed out that in FIR No.63 dated 09.06.2022 registered under Section 188 , 341, 353 IPC, the cancellation report has been accepted on 01.06.2023 by the concerned Court. It is, thus, apparent that as many as 36 persons no longer have to face the said proceedings. Similarly, it is pointed out that in FIR No.26 dated 16.03.2021 registered under Sections 186, 323, 341, 511 IPC cancellation report had been filed, but the complainant was not satisfied and re-investigation was done and again a cancellation report had been submitted and notice was issued to the complainant for 30.10.2023 by the Court of Shri Rahul Garg, Addl. CJM, Chandigarh.

3. Status report filed on behalf of respondent No.4-U.T. Chandigarh alongwith Annexure R-4/1 would go on to show that there are as many as 73 accused in FIR No.74 dated 08.08.2020 registered under Section 188 IPC, whereas in another FIR bearing No.76 dated 06.10.2021 under Sections 188 , 186, 353 and 332 IPC there are as many as 500-600 persons who have been arrayed as accused. Similarly, in FIR No.137 dated 07.08.2020 under Section 188 IPC 37 persons have been arrayed as accused. In FIR No.139 dated 10.08.2020 under Section 188 IPC as many as 75 persons are accused. In FIR No.324 dated 24.10.2020 under Section 188 IPC 39 persons are accused.

4. Status report by way of affidavit of Shri Ajay Singhal, Additional Director General of Police, Crime, Haryana has also been filed. A perusal of the same would go on to show that 8 cases are under investigation and another case has been lodged under Section 174A IPC bearing FIR no.120 dated 08.04.2023, Police Station Sector 31, Faridabad against Pritam Singh, Principal-cum-Chairman of M/s GCA Marketing Pvt. Ltd., who is stated to be an Ex-MLA from Bathinda, Punjab.

5. It has further been deposed that in FIR No.531 dated 27.12.2021 under Sections 323, 506, 509 IPC lodged at Police Station, Mahendergarh Shri Rao Bahadur Singh, Ex-MLA has been acquitted on 23.08.2023. Similarly, Shri Satinder Rana, Ex-MLA, Rajound, Kaithal had been acquitted by SDJM, Samalkha on 22.09.2023 in case FIR No.216 dated 07.04.2018 registered under Sections 454/380/120-B/206/207/188 IPC, Police Station Samalkha.

6. We find that at Sr. No.12 in FIR No.141 dated 06.05.2011 under Sections 148/149/307/302 IPC and 25/54/59 of ARMS ACT registered at Police Station Kalanaur, all prosecution witnesses have been examined and, therefore, we direct that the defence evidence, if any be completed at the earliest and the concerned Trial Court is requested to expedite the proceedings. Similarly, in FIR No.659 dated 29.07.2016 registered under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Sadar, Jhajjar all prosecution and defence witnesses have been examined and, therefore, we also direct the said Trial Court that proceedings be expedited.

7. Regarding FIR No.20 dated 18.10.2005 under Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC and 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Police Station, SVB (now ACB), Hisar, it is pointed out that three challans have been filed regarding recruitment of HCS and other Allied Services for the year 2001 and 2004 on 04.07.2023 and 05.07.2023, respectively and another challan has been filed regarding the recruitment of Assistant Professors. Regarding other 7 cases on a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top