SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2717

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, SANJIV BERRY, JJ.
M/s. Snoozer Bedding Ltd. & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Canara Bank & Anr. – Respondents
CM NO. 4944 & 6417-CWP of 2023 IN/AND CWP NO. 571
Decided On : 21-04-2023

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Yogesh Jain, Advocate; For the Appellant/Petitioners.
Mr. R.S. Bhatia, Advocate for the Non-Applicant/Respondents.

Headnote:(A) Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Sections 13(2) and 13(4) - Writ petition challenging notices and sale for bank loan default - Bank alleged Rs. 9.98 crores due - Petitioners failed to comply with payment agreements previously set - Writ dismissed for concealment of material facts; relies on judgment in Prestige Lights Ltd. v. State Bank of India emphasizing full disclosure to Writ Court. (Paras 2, 11, 13, 14)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - Exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction is contingent upon the disclosure of true and complete facts - Court may refuse to entertain petitions if successful concealment of facts is evident. (Paras 11, 12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenged notices under the Securitization Act regarding property due to bank loan defaults, yet allegedly concealed vital facts about an OTS settlement proposal from the Court.

Findings of Court:
The Court noted the concealment of facts and lack of merit in the petitioner's arguments; therefore, the writ was dismissed.

Issues: The main issues include the validity of the bank's notices and whether the petitioners are entitled to relief despite undisclosed material facts.

Ratio Decidendi: The court asserted that failure to disclose critical information undermines a party's case for relief in writ proceedings.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to securitization notices and order. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. petitioner seeks extension and argues for msme protections. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. disclosure of ots proposal is crucial for court. (Para 8 , 9)
4. court emphasis on disclosure of material facts. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. writ petition dismissed; funds ordered to be credited. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

Mr. G.S. Sandhawalia, J.

Today applications i.e. CM-4944 & 6417-CWP-2023 for recalling of the order dated 29.03.2023 and for seeking extension of time for depositing the part payment have been listed. With the consent of counsels for the parties the main case itself is taken on board for hearing.

2. Challenge in the present writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is to the notice issued under Section 13 (2) of the Securitization and Re-construction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short ' 2002 Act') dated 07.04.2021 (Annexure P-19) and the subsequent notice issued under Section 13 (4) of the 2002 Act dated 05.04.2022 (Annexure P-29) alongwith the sale notice dated 15.12.2022 (Annexure P-30). Challenge has also been raised to the order passed by the District Magistrate, SAS Nagar dated 06.12.2022 (Annexure P-31).

3. The property in dispute is House No.2657, Sector 60, Mohali measuring 500 square yard. A perusal of notice issued under Section 13 (2) of the 2002 Act (Annexure P-19) would go on to show that a sum of Rs. 9,98,43,126.76 was due on the ground that on 05.02.2020 the operation and conduct of the financial assistance had become irregular. Resultantly, the formal notice under Section 13 (4) of the 2002 Act was issued and symbolic possession of the said property was taken under Rule 8 & 9 on 05.04.2022. The District Magistrate passed the order dated 06.12.2022 (Annexure P-31) while keeping in mind the principles laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in ' Allahabad Bank v. District Magistrate, Ludhiana and others' , 2021 (3) PLR 690 and while noticing that a detailed affidavit had been submitted by the authorized officer and that present petitioners had been given opportunity to settle the matter with the Bank, but the settlement could not be effected.

4. The sale notice thereafter came to be issued and published in newspaper on 15.12.2022 (Annexure P-30) wherein it was noticed that there were total liabilities of Rs. 11,04,75,431.03 as on 11.12.2022 and the property measuring 500 square yards was put to sale with the reserve price of Rs. 4,62,13,000/-. The e-auction was fixed for 16.01.2023 as per the said notice.

5. The following order was passed on 12.01.2023 while noting the contention of the counsel for the petitioners:-

"It has been averred that the petitioner is a MSME Unit. Inter alia contends that prior to declaring the account of the petitioner/firm as NPA, the guidelines issued by the Reserve Bank of India dated 17.03.2016 on the subject of frame work for revival and re-habilitation of Micro, Small and Medium enterprises and in particular para 2.1 was not adhered to inasmuch as the matter was never placed before the duly constituted Committee.

Counsel further submits that against an outstanding amount of Rs.8.5 Crores approximately as of date, the petitioner/firm is willing to deposit a sum of Rs.25 lakhs on or before 16.01.2023, a further sum of Rs.25 lakhs by 31.01.2023 and another amount of Rs.50 lakhs by 28.02.2023.

Notice of motion, returnable for 25.04.2023.

In the meanwhile, physical dispossession of the residential property bearing No.2657, Sector 69, SAS Nagar, Mohali shall remain stayed. Further, the e-auction proceedings pursuant to the e-auction sale notice at Annexure P-30 slated for 16.01.2023 may proceed but the same be not finalized without the leave of this Court.

It is, however, made clear that in case, the petitioner/firm defaults as regards the deposit of different amounts as have been undertaken by the counsel and recorded in the order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top