Back
HARSH BUNGER
Food Corporation of India – Appellant
Versus
Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund Organization of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of writ petitions filed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. previous orders under challenge for not addressing core issues. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. parties' positions regarding epf coverage. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. arguments on epf contribution liability. (Para 11 , 15 , 17) |
| 5. discussion on appeal and jurisdictional issues. (Para 19) |
| 6. court's observations on evidential requirements. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. determination of liabilities under epf act. (Para 24 , 25 , 28 , 29) |
| 8. reiteration of procedural fairness and rights of parties. (Para 26) |
| 9. final judgment and orders issued. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT
Harsh Bunger, J.
This common order shall dispose of three writ petitions, being CWP-7208-2016 titled as "Ranbir Singh Punia and Company and others v. Food Corporation of India and others", CWP-12998-2018 titled as "Food Corporation of India v. Board of Trustees and others" and CWP-23903-2021 titled as " M/s Madan Lal Krishan Lal v. Food Corporation of India and others".
2. In CWP-12998-2018, the prayer made by the petitioner-Food Corporation of India is for quashing of order dated 18.10.2017 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Board of Trustees, Employees' Provident Fund Organizati
Employers must demonstrate coverability under the EPF Act through proper procedures before incurring liabilities related to employee contributions, supported by clear evidence.
An establishment employing more than 20 workers is covered under the Employees' Provident Fund Act, and failure to provide sufficient evidence to dispute its applicability leads to dismissal of certi....
The employer must ensure EPF contributions for all employees, including those employed through contractors, and must comply with principles of natural justice in assessment proceedings.
Point of Law : Provident Fund is not a tax. It is an amount collectable to the benefit of an individual identified employee as a social welfare measure.
The court determined that pygmy agents do not qualify as employees under the EPF Act, as there is no employer-employee relationship, thus the Act is not applicable.
The Commissioner must conduct an independent inquiry under Section 7A of the Act, ensuring compliance with natural justice principles before determining amounts due from employers.
The court established that the Central Board of Trustees has the standing to challenge Tribunal orders and that the assessment of PF contributions must be based on actual wages drawn by employees, no....
The importance of considering evidence and applying the provisions of the Act properly in reaching a decision.
The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to natural justice principles in administrative proceedings, particularly ensuring that parties are given adequate opportunity to contest findings befor....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
