HARSH BUNGER
Om Parkash – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Harsh Bunger, J. (Oral)
The instant application has been filed under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for grant of leave to file appeal against impugned judgment dated 02.02.2018 passed by learned Judicial MagistrateIst Class, Hisar; whereby, respondent No.2-accused has been acquitted of the charges framed against him.
2. Briefly, applicant-complainant (Om Parkash) filed a complaint under Section 420 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (for short 'the IPC'), wherein it was alleged that the complainant is doing the work of agriculture. It was stated that the Delhi government had invited the applications forDDA flat in Rohini (Delhi); wherein, the applicant-complainant filled up the form No.0871413 through State Bank of India, after depositing of Rs.5,050/- on 15.09.2008. As per the complaint, after three months of depositing the form, draw was declared by the DDA and the complainant received a telephonic message from the respondent No.2-accused that he is an employee of DDA department. It is alleged that respondent No.2-accused informed the complainant that he was successful in the draw of DDA and a flat of DDA is declared in the name of the complainant. It is alleged
Allarakha K. Mansuri v. State of Gujarat
Roopwanti v. State of Haryana, 2023(3) Scale 323, Decided on 24.02.2023
In appeals against acquittal under NI Act s.138, High Court interferes only if perverse, misreads evidence, or sole guilt view possible; reasonable defence rebutting presumption warrants upholding ac....
Point of Law : Presumption Under Section 139 is a rebuttable presumption and the onus is on the accused to raise the probable defence. The standard of proof for rebutting the presumption is that of p....
Conviction can be based solely on the testimony of official witnesses if the evidence of such official witnesses inspires confidence.
An appellate court reviewing a trial court's acquittal must respect the presumption of innocence unless the judgment demonstrates clear and manifest errors in the consideration of evidence.
Point of law: So far as the presumption under Section 20 of the PC Act is concerned, it trite that even the presumption under Section 20 of the PC Act can be drawn only after demand for and acceptanc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.