SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Guj) 868

ASHOKKUMAR C.JOSHI
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Dahyabhai Kalidas Parmar A. H. C. B. No. 1398 – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Hardik Soni, A.P.P.
For the Respondents: Mr. M.P. Shah, Ms. Kruti M. Shah.

JUDGMENT :

1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant – State under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 challenging the judgment and order dated 30.08.2006, passed in Special Case No. 15 of 2002 by the learned Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court No. 15, Vadodara, recording the acquittal.

2. The facts, in brief, are that a complaint was filed against one Ganpatbhai Budhabhai by Ibrahimbhai Malek, resident of Bhayali village being application No.96/2002, investigation of which, was with accused No.1 – Dahyabhai Kalidas Parmar, who was Writer – Constable and accused No.2 – Punambhai Kishanbhai Bhaliya, Unarmed Head Constable, was the Assistant Writer of the accused No. 1 and the accused No.3 – Smt. Lilaben Ramsinh Chauhan, ASI, was working as a Writer Head in the Taluka Police Station as well as was being Police Station Officer, had been handling the Station Diary duty. The accused No.1 allegedly called the respondent in the said application – Jayantibhai Budhabhai at the Taluka Police station and demanded bribe of Rs.1,000/- for bail related procedures, which, after bargaining, eventually, finalized at Rs.400/-. The respondent of the said application was as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top