Back
JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
Saurab @ Sorab – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed under article 226 for parole (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments for parole based on wife's medical condition (Para 2) |
| 3. state arguments against parole eligibility (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. analysis of superintendent's order on parole (Para 6) |
| 5. dismissal of petition due to lack of illegality (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, J. (Oral)
The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the impugned speaking order dated 14.03.2023 (Annexure P-2) whereby respondent No.3 i.e. Superintendent, District Jail, Nuh had rejected the parole application of the present petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that earlier also the petitioner had filed a petition before this Court and further submitted that the wife of the petitioner is suffering from medical illness and a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Annexure P-1 had directed the Superintendent of Jail to decide the prayer of the petitioner for grant of parole within time bound manner and consequently, the impugned order (Annexure P-2) was passed. He further submitted that the wife of the pe
A hardcore prisoner is ineligible for emergency parole unless he completes five years of imprisonment after the latest offence; however, the court may permit temporary release for last rites under es....
The right to seek treatment under Article 21 of the Constitution of India can influence the decision regarding parole, especially in cases of medical necessity.
The court has the discretion to grant parole based on the necessity for the petitioner to perform certain ceremonies for his son's marriage.
Granting parole is not a vested right of a convict prisoner and can be refused based on the prisoner's conduct and the circumstances of the case.
The right to procreation and parenthood is protected under Article 21 of the Constitution, and prior misconduct should not negate a convict's current compliance and genuine needs for parole.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
