JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Satyanarayan – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mr. Jasjit Singh Bedi, J. (Oral)
This order shall dispose of two criminal miscellaneous petitions i.e. CRM-M-20067-2024 and CRM-M-25754-2024 as they arise out of the same FIR.
2. The petitioner-Satyanarayan (in CRM-M-20067-2024) and the petitioner-Pardeep Kumar (in CRM-M-25754-2024) seek the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case bearing FIR No.10 dated 19.01.2024 under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC registered at Police Station Industrial Area Bhiwani, District Bhiwani, Haryana.
3. For the sake of convenience, the facts are being taken from the petition bearing No. CRM-M-25754-2024.
4. The present FIR came to be registered at the instance of Narender Dalal and reads as under:-
The absence of custodial interrogation does not justify granting anticipatory bail; the prima facie case against the accused must be the primary consideration.
A second or successive petition for anticipatory bail is maintainable but requires a substantial change in circumstances to succeed. Repetitive filings for the same relief without such changes consti....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.