Back
JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Satyanarayan – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mr. Jasjit Singh Bedi, J. (Oral)
This order shall dispose of two criminal miscellaneous petitions i.e. CRM-M-20067-2024 and CRM-M-25754-2024 as they arise out of the same FIR.
2. The petitioner-Satyanarayan (in CRM-M-20067-2024) and the petitioner-Pardeep Kumar (in CRM-M-25754-2024) seek the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case bearing FIR No.10 dated 19.01.2024 under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC registered at Police Station Industrial Area Bhiwani, District Bhiwani, Haryana.
3. For the sake of convenience, the facts are being taken from the petition bearing No. CRM-M-25754-2024.
4. The present FIR came to be registered at the instance of Narender Dalal and reads as under:-
The absence of custodial interrogation does not justify granting anticipatory bail; the prima facie case against the accused must be the primary consideration.
The seriousness of economic offences and the need for a different approach in bail considerations for such cases.
The court may grant anticipatory bail based on the lack of previous criminal history and the circumstances of the case, including the conduct of other involved parties.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the exercise of discretion in granting anticipatory bail based on the nature of the allegations, role attributed to the accused, and the law laid d....
The court denied anticipatory bail due to serious allegations of cheating, emphasizing the need for custodial interrogation in economic offences to protect societal interest and ensure effective inve....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
