IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KULDEEP TIWARI, J.
Harmandeep Singh Alias Harman – Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRM-M-15699 of 2024
Decided On : 09-05-2024
JUDGMENT
Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, J. (Oral)
Through the instant petition, the petitioner craves for indulgence of this Court for his being enlarged on regular bail, in case FIR No.116 dated 05.06.2014, under Sections 22/27/61/85 of the NDPS Act, registered at Police Station Sadar, Jalandhar.
Allegations Against The Petitioner
2. A perusal of the FIR reflects that the petitioner, and other two co-accused were arrested by the Police, who were carrying some intoxicating substance, which were later on discovered as diphenoxylate Hydrochloride. The recovery which was effected from the present petitioner was 55 grams of intoxicant powder, and, whereas, from the co-accused Sandeep 150 grams of intoxicant powder was recovered. Therefore, the total recovery which was effected from the three persons falls within the ambit of commercial quantity. Earlier in the instant matter, petitioner was granted bail, however, due to his absence before the learned trial Court concerned, he was declared as proclaimed offender on 13.10.2016. On 21.01.2024, the petitioner was finally arrested, and since then he is behind the bars, and is facing trial in the FIR in question.
Submissions Of Learned Counsel For The Petitioner
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner, in his asking for the hereinabove extracted relief, has made the following submissions:-
(i) The petitioner is suffering from hapatitis-B, and therefore, his condition is very bad, and is unable to do his day-to-day activities in the jail, without any help;
(ii) The co-accused Sandeep was acquitted by the learned trial Court concerned, vide judgment dated 06.03.2017, whereas the third co-accused Talwinder Singh @ Sonu has in fact died, during the pendency of the trial.
(iii) On the same set of allegations, once the co-accused has earned acquittal, therefore, there is no likelihood that the petitioner shall be convicted;
(iv) Petitioner has suffered incarceration of more than 09 months, as on today.
(v) The petitioner is not involved in any other case.
Submissions Of The Learned State Counsel
4. Status report by way of affidavit dated 08.05.2024, of Sh. Sukhninder Singh, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Sub Division V, Cantt Jalandhar, Commissionerate Jalandhar has been filed on behalf of respondent-State. The same is taken on record.
5. Medical status report by way of affidavit dated 08.05.2024, of Sh. Kulwant Singh, Superintendent of Central Jail, Kapurthala has been filed on behalf of respondent-State. The same is taken on record.
6. As per the medical status report, the petitioner is suffering from hapatitis. The relevant part of the report reads as under:-
"On dated 04/03/2024, he was referred to Civil Hospital Kapurthala. He got admitted to Civil Hospital Kapurthala from where he was further referred on dated 06/03/2024 to Government Medical College and Hospital Amritsar and he got admitted the same day. His chief complaint was yellowish discoloration of eyes, fever and bleeding from nose, for which he was treated. All his routine blood tests were done throughout his course of admission, which came out to be normal towards the end of his date of discharge from the GMC Amritsar. His ultrasound abdomen was performed which showed splenomegaly. His CECT abdomen was performed which showed hepatomegaly + hepatitis, abdominal lymphadenopathy, thickened ilio-caecal junction. He was prescribed oral medications for the same. On dated 25/03/2024, he was discharged from Government Medical College and Hospital Amritsar. He was prescribed oral anti-tubercular medicines and other oral medications with all blood tests within normal limits and vitals stable."
7. The learned State counsel has placed on record the custody certificate issued by the Superintendent of Central Jail, District Kapurthala. The same is taken on record. A perusal of the custody certificate reveals that petitioner is not involved in any other case. A perusal of the custody certificate further reveals that the petitioner has suffered incarceration
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab, (1980) 2 SCC 565
AI
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; the court must consider the health of the accused and the acquittal of co-accused when deciding bail applications.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; the presumption of innocence and circumstances of each case govern bail decisions.
The fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence that 'Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception' and the right to a speedy trial are central legal points established in the judgment.
The court established that bail is the default option in criminal law, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the right to a speedy trial, prior to evaluating eyewitness testimony.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.