PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
KULDEEP TIWARI
Bittu Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Kuldeep Tiwari, J.
Through the instant petition, the petitioners craves for indulgence of this Court for his being enlarged on regular bail, in case FIR No. 168 dated 11.12.2023, under Section 395 of IPC, under Section 25 of the Arms Act (under Section 336 of IPC, was added later on), registered at Police Station Raman, District Bathinda.ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS
2. The instant FIR was registered on the statement of the complainant Ramchander Singh s/o Hari Singh r/o Village Bhagiwandar, District Bathinda, inter alia alleging therein, that on the date of occurrence, he along with his salesman Satpal Singh & Sony went to sleep in the cabin constructed on the petrol pump, at about 12:30 a.m at night, two identified persons knocked the cabin, and on the pretext of purchasing oil in a bottle, the complainant, Satpal Singh & Sony opened the door, then the said two unidentified persons entered into their cabin, and along with them two other persons came along holding takuas in their hands, and one person who was armed with pistol, entered into the cabin. All the said persons threatened the complainant, Satpal Singh & Sony, that if they raise their voice, they will be k
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; the presumption of innocence and circumstances of each case govern bail decisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.