Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
KULDEEP TIWARI
Surbhi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Kuldeep Tiwari, J.
Through the instant petition, the petitioner craves for indulgence of this Court for her being enlarged on regular bail, in case FIR No.463 dated 10.10.2023, under Sections 328 and 380 of IPC (under Sections 420, 120-B and 201 of IPC, added later on), registered at Police Station DLF, District Gurugram.ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE PETITIONER
2. The prosecution agency was set into motion on a complaint made by one Rohit Gupta, alleging therein, that he was using a dating App named Bumble, and on the said App on 01.10.2023, he met a girl, who introduced herself as Sakshi/Payal, but, whereas, actually her name was Surbhi (present petitioner). On that day i.e. 01.10.2023, at around 10:00 pm, on asking of the present petitioner, the complainant picked up the petitioner from the Dockyard Bar, Sector 47,Gurugram, and bought some liquor from a liquor shop, and then came back to complainants house. During the short stay of the present petitioner at complainants house, at night, the present petitioner mixed some intoxicating substance in his drink, due to which the complainant became unconscious, and thereafter, when he woke up, he found that his 20 grams of gold chain
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; the presumption of innocence and circumstances of each case govern bail decisions.
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; the court must consider the health of the accused and the acquittal of co-accused when deciding bail applications.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
