Back
SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Ved Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim based on ineffective land use. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for quashing acquisition based on land utilization. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's consideration of finality of acquisition process. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal interpretation of applicable laws. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. previous judgments affecting current case. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. writ petition dismissed due to lack of merit. (Para 13) |
JUDGMENT
Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, J.
The petitioner has, through the instant writ petition, sought quashing of the land acquisition notifications dated 12.05.1995 and 10.05.1996, issued respectively under sections 4 and 6 of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT , 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 1894'), on the ground, that the acquired lands have not been put to any efficacious use, despite elapse of more than 25 years.
2. As a matter of fact, the petitioner was owner of the petition lands, situated at Village Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar, which were put to acquisition, through issuance of an acquisition notice, under Section 4 of the Act of 1894, on 12.05.1995, by the State of Haryana, through Urban Estate Department, for the purpose of development, utilization for residential, i
Land Acquisition - Process of acquisition was completed way back in the year 1987-88. The petitioners have even received the compensation and did not raise any objection immediately thereafter. They ....
The judgment establishes the importance of physical possession and disbursement of compensation in determining the lapsing of acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
