SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Ram Phal – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legitimacy of land acquisition and claims. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. malafide intent behind petition. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. history and status of litigation. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. insufficient evidence to support claims. (Para 7 , 15 , 20) |
| 5. constructive res judicata as a defense. (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. conditions for denotification of acquired land. (Para 12 , 13 , 18) |
| 7. public interest over private interest. (Para 17 , 19) |
| 8. dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 21) |
JUDGMENT
Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, J.
Through the instant writ petition, the petitioners crave the indulgence of this Court, for issuance of a mandamus upon the respondent(s) concerned, to allot/release the lands of the petitioners, acquisition proceedings whereof were lawfully terminated in the year 1983, i.e. around 4 decades back. The relief (supra) is cast on the premise that the acquired lands fall in close proximity, i.e. within 900 meters, of the restricted area of the Ammunition Depot of the Military.
2. The instant writ petition, though is camouflaged to reap the relief (supra), however, the primary reason behind the institution of the instant writ petition, appears to be the malafide intention of the petitioners to retain th
Aflatoon v. Lt. Governor of Delhi
Gurmukh Singh v. State of Haryana
Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal (2020) 8 SCC 129 : AIR 2020 (Supreme Court) 1496
Lalit Kumar v. State of Haryana
Market Committee v. Krishan Murari
Municipal Corpn. of Greater Bombay v. Industrial Development and Investment Co. (P) Ltd.
Rabindranath Bose v. Union of India
Star Wire (India) Ltd. v. State of Haryana
State of Haryana v. Dewan Singh
State of Kerala v. M. Bhaskaran Pillai AIR 1997 SC 2703
State of Mysore v. V.K. Kangan
Tilokchand Motichand v. H.B. Munshi
The court affirmed that lands acquired for public purpose cannot be deemed unviable based solely on non-utilization, emphasizing the executive's discretion in assessing public interest.
Land acquisition proceedings are invalid if statutory requirements are not met, particularly regarding notifications and timelines, as established by the Land Acquisition Act and the 2013 Act.
Point of law: when once the proceedings are completed, the question of application of Section 101 of Act No. 30 of 2013 does not arise.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.